Thursday, December 12, 2013

Roxana Robinson


The author I chose to focus on was Roxana Robinson. Her perspective on the writing process was told in a unique and interesting way. She believes that writing is for the author on a personal level and that the actual writing has nothing to do with the reader. She says writing is about trying to figure out a situation and make sense of it all. Her goal as a writer is to write a story and get it exactly right. Robinson (2000) believes that the reader becomes important in this stage of the process. She needs the audience to let her know if she is writing the perfect story. Without opinion and input she cannot truly know if her story is the perfect story.

After much thought I believe that Robinson is correct. I do believe that a lot of what a writer writes about is for the writer. What the author writes is for them and then they share it with the audience for input and feedback on the story. If you are writing a story than that story must interest you in some way or another or it won’t have any real meaning. Sylvia Day is a well-known author. She has written many books; a particular series I am familiar with is the Crossfire series. Originally it was thought that she was writing a trilogy. At the end of the third book she explains how she is not ready to let her characters go. Instead it is important for her to keep writing and see where their journey is going to take them. She is truly involved and connected in her own story.  Day is clearly writing these books for her. It appears these characters have become a part of her. That is a good writer. There has to be feeling and connection and belief to make the story work. If the author doesn’t believe it than who will? This is a perfect example of how the writer is writing for her own personal reasons still. If she wasn’t she would’ve given the audience the trilogy and ending they wanted. She personally must not have been ready for that yet.

My thinking has changed a lot after taking this course on a writer’s perspective regarding social media. Social media is popular and the way to get to people. The typical writer is sort of at a disadvantage with social media. Books are long and they tell a story, which I love. However, in today’s world nobody wants to read anything for more than 30 seconds at a time and move on. Social media allows this with Twitter, Facebook, and many others. A writer’s perspective has to change. They have to figure out how to reach the audience or tell their story in a shorter time frame. After taking this class I believe that a writer should always follow the SPJ code of ethics when writing, especially when social media is involved. This will allow for quality writing and accurate information and storytelling. I honestly never thought of anyone needing to be ethical when using the internet until this course. This course has opened my eyes and allowed me to see that ethical writing and a writer’s perspective on the subject is extremely important. It is the difference between fact and fiction. It is the difference between trustworthy and untrustworthy. When it comes right down to it, the writer’s perspective is the important perspective. Their view is what is telling the story. Until now I’ve never thought of writing in this way before. I’ve always pictured writing being for the audience, never the writer. This is an interesting way to look at the writer’s perspective. Robinson had an interesting take on a writer’s perspective. It holds true for both traditional writing and social media. Ultimately the author is writing for the author in most cases.

Resources:

Day, S. (2013). Entwined with you. Berkley Trade. 1 edition.

Robinson, R. (2000). If you invent the story, you are the first to see how it ends. The New York

            Times on the web. Retrieved from

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

News Flash with Multimedia Tool


The objective of my creation was to draw in the audience. I wanted the audience to be able to have a visual that grabbed their attention and made them want to visit the website. There is a saying, a picture is worth a thousand words. I was trying to get my audience to view the picture and hopefully it speaks for itself.

I chose using a picture advertisement over other forms because this is what I felt would draw in the audience the most successfully. My press release is about getting honest and trustworthy news; so, I felt the way to show what I meant was through an advertisement. News ads tend to grab your attention with headlines. They make you want to read the article or go to the website. This is what I was trying to accomplish when choosing an ad for my multimedia tool. I didn't feel a video or screen shots would have quite the same effect. I think simple but flashy makes it easier for the audience to become engaged. Plus, in today's society the attention span of the average person is minimal. I was afraid a video or demonstration would cause people to lose interest. I wanted something everyone could understand.

I feel the ad enhances my message because it says what my press release says but in fewer words and very simply put. There are a lot of people in the world who are visual learners. Just reading my press release, no matter how catchy it is, won't draw in everyone. Seeing a bright, flashy, picture that states the purpose provides the viewer with more to work with. It gives them more to base their opinion on. If the article itself doesn't grab your attention right away the picture probably would. The picture ad is simple. It tells what the website it about and gives the link to the site, hopefully pulling the viewer in and making them want to see more items such as this on my site. Since you never know what type of person will be viewing the press release I felt it was better to keep it simple. This way everyone from a high school level to a graduate level can understand.

Picture retrieved from http://makebpdstigmafree.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/news-flash.png?w=630&h=420

Photo editing performed using www.pixlr.com/editor

Friday, November 15, 2013

Live Your Dream Blog

I looked at a blogging site for women called Live Your Dream.org. It is an inspiring site that tries to empower women into living their dreams. The site has many different blog posts for women including career, health, financial, and lifestyle. The main function or purpose of the blog site is to give women tools and advice to help them accomplish their dreams. The blog links you to many well-known women bloggers to research more into their work and brings their work to you on their site. The public appears to be well incorporated in the blog. They can send in their blogs or articles and have them posted on the site to help inspire others as well or just to have their story heard. They have an area on the blog called live your dream and it is a space for the public to get daily inspirational readings, words of wisdom, or tools that may help them accomplish their goals. The public is also free to post comments and share and like the blogs to give feedback. The blog appears to me to be well rounded including both the writer and the public.

The blogging site has a lot of substance. There is the main page which highlights featured blogs for the day. There is a section that tells all about the site and what their goal is that they are trying to accomplish. There is a section to donate and to volunteer if you'd like to get actively involved with what they are trying to accomplish through their blog site. There is a lot of content. The blog has featured bloggers but it also links you to former blogs that were on the site. There are 4 sections which are career, financial, health, and lifestyle that all blog about different aspects of a woman's life and how to help her through and motivate her. You can pledge, join the site, and shop all to help the cause of helping less fortunate women and girls' accomplish their goals in life.

I feel that it is an effective blog. The site has loads of information. If I would click on career it brings up all of the career blogs for me to choose from and there are a lot. If you like a specific blogger you can click on their name and it will bring up all of their work. It does this for every section you click on. It is very well organized and put together. The site provides details and allows you to comment and give feedback and in that way I feel it is effective for the public because there is an interaction occurring. The main purpose of the blog is to help empower women and I think the site does exactly that. There is no negativity on the site at all. It is all positive and uplifting material aiming to make you become the person you want to become by giving you tools and readings to help you along the way. Since the goal of the site is to help women I believe it does exactly that. By the time I was done reviewing the site I wanted to join.

When you are crafting a blog I feel it is necessary to have a goal in mind. You need to know why you are blogging and what you are trying to achieve. You need to say what you are trying to achieve and how you are going to achieve it. The blog needs to have good, reliable information and links to sources to back up your information. A very important aspect of a blog is a comments or feedback section. It is important to let the public know that they matter. If you don't they could very quickly lose interest and not follow your blog. Blogs can be very effective if used in the right way. When blogging it is important to remember to stay ethical and honest. Don't provide misleading or false information. That is detrimental in a blog when following best practices.

I've never looked to much into blogs before this class but I'm starting to expand out and research them a little more. This blog I found interesting and informative and full of stories and information that I didn't even know were available. It made me want to research more blogs and see what I could find. I found this to be a great mode of delivery for information because everything you could possible need is right in front of you at the click of a mouse.

Resource:
Live your dream.org (2013). Retrieved from http://www.liveyourdream.org/yourdream.html

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

News Flash

"News Flash - A news portal that gives the facts in a flash

Receive the facts and decide for yourself

Newark, OHIO. Nov. 06, 2013/News Flash /- News Flash is a new online portal that delivers accurate and informative information in the blink of an eye. We are here for you!


The online portal was created to inform the public by using the most accurate and up to date information available. The online site will focus on using three major functions that Kovach & Rosenstiel feel are necessary to journalism. The portal will follow the functions so that the readers are getting the most informative and accurate information available.

Our goal is to provide news in a flash that is accurate, detailed, and trustworthy. News Flash will focus on being an authenticator. We will make sure that all of our news and facts are reliable and accurate. We will not print information until it has been verified by at least two credible sources. We will be the investigator for the public. We will investigate all of our sources and information before providing you with any details. This will eliminate false information. We will do this by having a person dedicated to investigating information as it comes in. Most importantly, we will be the news portal that makes sense of all of the information for you. A team of qualified experts will evaluate the information and give the reader the information they need to develop their own opinion based on the facts. Our news site is not designed to decide for you. We want to give you the facts and allow you to decide for yourself.


About News Flash
My name is Misty Burke. I am the founder and creator of News Flash.


Contact:
Misty Burke
News Flash
Phone:
misty.burke@newsflash.org
www.newsflash.org

Resource:
Kovach, B. & Rosenstiel, T. (2011). Blur: How To Know What's True In The Age Of Information Overload. New York, New York. Bloomsbury USA.

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Newly discovered social media outlets


There are two social media outlets that I have never tried before until now; they are Twitter and Blogger. I have never used Twitter because I never saw the point. From my previous understanding people used it to post what they were thinking and that was it. I now have a better understanding of Twitter. I was able to set up an account and get started. I set up my account and started “following” people. This means that whatever they post will show up on my wall for me to view. What I found interesting was that I could follow many different types of things. I am currently following Alexander Ovechkin; who is a hockey player and ESPN. This is really interesting because just by following ESPN I can look at my wall and get current updates. Tonight it told me about the nerves happening going into game 6 and that the game was about to start. I like the fact that you can follow everything you like and it all appears on your news feed. I also like that you have the ability to un-follow people and not allow them to follow you. It gives a certain amount of privacy so that the only people that see what you post are the people you allow to see it. The other interesting aspect is that you can only post 140 characters. I know from being a Facebook user that people can post what feels like a book on your news feed about everything happening in their life. Twitter does not allow you to do that. Instead it forces you to keep what you are saying short and to the point. Lastly, I have never been a fan of using hash tag because I never saw the point. To use it just to use it I still don’t like. What I learned is that you can use the hash tag and be linked to pages and pictures that people post. That is a new and interesting feature. I just saw at my last Blue Jacket game that if you sent a tweet and did #CBJ than you would appear on the jumbo tron in the arena. This is a new way for the arena to interact without needing a camera running around.

The 2nd social media outlet I have tried using within the last few months has been blogger. Blogger is a site where you setup a page and design it to your liking. Then you can post a blog, which can be about anything that you feel like posting about. Mine have been all about different aspects of social media and communication. If someone is out there looking for information on the subject they can read my information and continue to follow it if they like what I have to say. It is a way to get your thoughts about issues or subjects out for other people to see or view. Just like Twitter the site allows you to follow people and be followed so that you can keep up to date with their posts. It is another way of communicating with all different types of people.

Personally, I feel that Twitter is the site that is going to be most effective at reaching an audience. Blogging is a great way of getting information out but you have to specifically be looking for it. I am 26 years old and have heard about blogging for years but I had never done it and I have never known many people that have used it. It reaches a wide audience but mostly people who are researching information or blog regularly. Blogging seems to be more of a specific group of people instead of a variety of people. Twitter is something that people ranging from ages 10-80 are going to use. There is something on there for everybody it seems. You can search music, movies, celebrities, family, and the list just continues to go on. There is a large variety of Twitter that blogging doesn’t have. Plus, I feel people have a very short attention span in today’s world. That being said, saying something in 140 characters is going to grab people’s attention much more than 5 paragraphs; most people are too busy to read something that long.  I was just in a weekly HR meeting and Twitter was brought up. The SVP was asking if we were utilizing Twitter and Facebook because they were to important not to be using for hiring purposes. That shows to me that Twitter is a site that is can reach a wide variety of people. We are not focusing on areas that blog because it doesn’t have the same appeal. Businesses want catch phrases which work perfectly with the Twitter character rule of only using 140 letters. Phrases like now hiring or 50% off sale. I think ultimately Twitter has more to offer people. Both are good ways of communicating but Twitter is more in tune with today’s society and the fast paced world we live in.

Saturday, October 12, 2013

This week I read an interesting article on how to evaluate credible resources. Next, I chose an online news article and tried to determine if I thought the information was credible based on the sources the author provided. This was a little trickier than I first thought it would be.

I chose an article from The Huffington Post (www.huffingtonpost.com) called What Can You Believe About 'Obamacare'? by Linda Bergthold. This article discusses multiple myths about the new health care and rather they are valid. Berthold (2013) discusses sources in her article and mentions how important it is to check out information for yourself. She wrote her article using hyperlinks so it allowed you to verify anything in her work that you may be questioning. As I followed these sources I found relevant information. The first link was to the Department of Labor website which discussed all about the Affordable Care Act. It seemed to be a decent, reliable source. All of her links took me to places that I could find where she retrieved her information from so that I could evaluate it for myself. The only link I saw a problem with was the link to "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act because it took me to a Wikipedia site. I know from previous experience with Wikipedia that although it can be helpful it may not be accurate. Anybody can post on Wikipedia about anything, I would have preferred a more credible source for the information regarding this subject. Overall, her article was full of useful information with credible sources to back her up (2012).

In the article that I read, Criteria to Evaluate the Credibility of WWW Resources, there are certain guidelines to follow to verify the accuracy of a website or a source. If we follow such guidelines we will be able to verify the accuracy of the source better than before. The article that I used was a good example of accurate & inaccurate sources according to this article. The guidelines include matters such as: contact information, up to date information, author biased, what kind of website is the information appearing on, and complete list of works cited page; just to name a few. Based on these guidelines, The Huffington Post article meets some positive criteria for accurate sourcing. For instance, according to the articles guidelines the information is reliable based on contact information and current information. The author has her contact information on the page and the information in her article is relevant and current. Almost every phrase and term was linked to a website that has credibility and is kept up to date. This is allowing us researching to be aware that the information is current. Also, the author doesn't appear to be biased at all. There are myths stated and some are agreed with and some are not but either way anything that is posted has a website or information to back it up. All and all this article seems reliable as does the author that wrote it. It is probably safe to assume that not all articles are going to meet all guidelines but this article did meet important ones.

There are so many different websites which is why it can be difficult to identify accurate information and sourcing. According to the article about evaluating criteria, there are different kinds of web sites such as: professional, homepage, and news. Knowing what kind of web site you are on can help you to identify what kind of information you are receiving (http://mason.gmu.edu/~montecin/web-eval-sites.htm). The main problem with web sites is that anybody can post information. Previously I mentioned that my author linked information to a Wikipedia site. This site cannot truly be trusted because anybody can post on it. I went to nursing school with a girl who posted that she was a rock star and it stayed on wikipedia for over a year. This is a perfect example of how allowing anybody to post online can lead to false information. The Wikipedia site Linda Bergthold choose did seem to have very accurate information but because of the site it is on it is still questionable. I feel that through mass media unrestricted web publishing will continue to cause inaccurate and non-trustworthy information. If there is not going to be a restriction on who can post information than there could potentially always be false information. The only way to have mass media progress more towards accurate information is to restrict who can post about specific subject matters. If you do not meet the requirements than you can not post. The resource article for class clearly discusses the different web sites, different domain names, etc. Certain domains when I was in school were safe to use such as .edu and .gov. Now they are not because the web site is not restricted and anybody can post. If we would prevent false information from going on web sites than we could identify more easily the accurate and current information. Until we do something to prevent the false information nobody will be able to truly identify fact from fiction. Mass media will continue to be populated with false information if something does not prevent anything from being posted. In my opinion, this is where the issue lies.

Resources:

http://mason.gmu.edu/~montecin/web-eval-sites.htm

Bergthold, L. (2013). What Can You Believe About 'Obamacare'?
http: www.huffingtonpost.com/linda-bergthold/what-can-you-believe-abou_b_4082121.html

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

COM 510 - Discovering Social Media

Facebook is my addiction when it comes to social media. I am on it daily, and it is not really to see anything specific, but more as a tool when I am bored to pass the time. Anytime I am bored I find myself wandering to my Facebook page to see what my friends are doing, read about people's daily lives, etc. These are the things I see on a daily basis when I log in to Facebook. Generally, when I am on Facebook I am on my IPhone so I don't see as much as I do when I log in to my computer. I've always viewed Facebook as a social network where you keep up with friends and family through the news feed. I can't even say when the last time I logged in with my actual computer was. So today I decided to log on and see if I saw a different view of Facebook than what I normally see.

When I log in on the laptop it is like I'm viewing a whole other world. On the right are the crazy amount of games that are supposedly popular right now. What caught my eye on the right was the section with videos that say sponsors. This caught my attention because I have never noticed it before. I know Facebook is ran by people but generally I only pay attention to the people I am friends with and what they post. I've never thought of Facebook as a source of advertisement for large companies. As I clicked on the sponsors page there is an add for a college of nursing, how workouts help burn fat, the newest TV show to watch and the best movies coming out and the list goes on.

This made me think. Is the Pediatric Dentistry of Central Ohio really the best place to go. Their add says they offer pleasant visits and always with a smile. Do they really always offer this kind of service? Do they always have happy children leaving as their add suggests? Maybe they do but it doesn't change the fact that there is no way to know. All that I really know is that they are being advertised by Facebook for a reason. Nobody advertises for free. Plus, if you think about it Facebook is the perfect place to advertise, millions upon millions of people view it everyday and if they are as loyal to the site as I am then they probably believe the advertisements and recommendations put forth by the site. I would probably at least look up the Dentist if I had a child that needed dental work. Just as I would look at the delicious looking meal that is so easy to prepare according to the picture. The fact of the matter is, are these really the best places to go or have they paid their way on to the site?

Honestly, I believe some sites are reliable for obtaining credible information. I've found very credible information on CNN, Time Magazine, The Columbus Dispatch, etc. These are all sites that have good credibility and generally the information is reliable, if the information changes they are some of the first to let you know. That is an attempt on their part to provide credible information to the people. Do I believe Facebook, Twitter, and Instragram are credible, no I don't. I enjoy them as much as the next person but I wouldn't go there when looking for breaking news or resources.